A lot of recent Q&A threads revolve around a simple confusion: 1235 sounds like a "specific performance" alloy, but it is mainly valued for high purity and formability. In practice, 1235 is a 1xxx series alloy that is typically around 99.35% aluminum minimum, with the remainder being small amounts of silicon and iron. That chemistry tends to translate into good ductility, clean surface appearance, and stable converting performance in many packaging and tape jobs.
Compared with 8011 or 8079, the difference is usually not "better or worse," but "different priorities." Many 8xxx alloys are chosen when converters want a balance of strength, pinhole resistance, and runnability at very thin gauges for certain packaging structures. 1235 is frequently chosen when a high-aluminum base is preferred for consistent forming and clean finishing, and when the downstream process is more sensitive to surface cleanliness and uniformity.
If you are evaluating multiple alloys, it helps to ask the supplier what the target application is (tape backing, pharmaceutical packaging laminate, capacitor, or other). You can also compare typical mechanical property windows by temper and thickness rather than focusing only on alloy name.
For a quick overview of where 1235 sits in the pure-aluminum family, see 1xxx Aluminum.
People on Google and Quora often ask this in a single sentence, but the real answer depends on your market and your converting process. The base metal itself is widely used in packaging supply chains. However, food-contact safety is usually proven by compliance documentation and process controls, not only by alloy.
When requesting 1235 for food-related packaging, ask for:
Also clarify whether you need one-side bright, two-side bright, matte, or controlled gloss. Many "is it safe" problems on real projects come from mismatch between the converter's lamination, adhesive, or ink system and the foil surface condition, not from the alloy designation.
This is one of the hottest practical questions because new purchasers usually start from a target thickness, then struggle with temper selection. While exact specs vary by producer and end-use, the most common purchasing pattern is:
Here is a decision-style table you can use when discussing requirements with a supplier.
| Application focus | Typical thickness range (reference) | Common temper direction | What to confirm before ordering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible packaging barrier layer | 6 to 20 mic | Softer to medium | Pinhole performance, surface cleanliness, wetting and lamination bond |
| Foil tape backing | 20 to 80 mic | Medium to harder | Tensile, elongation, adhesive compatibility, flatness after slitting |
| General insulation lamination | 9 to 50 mic | Medium | Wrinkle resistance, coil set, consistent gloss level |
If your project is specifically for tape and related converting, this product page can be a helpful reference point for typical supply scope: 1235 Aluminum Foil Battery and Tape.
This is a recurring question on Q&A platforms, especially from new sourcing teams. Price swings usually come from a combination of metal cost and processing cost, plus the "hidden" costs of quality requirements.
Common drivers include:
A practical tip: ask for a quotation that separates the metal component from the conversion component (rolling, slitting, annealing, packing). Even if the supplier will not disclose every detail, a split structure helps you compare offers more fairly when aluminum prices move.
Many real-world complaints show up only after slitting, printing, or lamination, so incoming inspection matters. You can do several effective checks with simple tools.
For thin gauges, a basic light-table test is a useful screen. Place a sample sheet over a bright, uniform light source in a darkened area and count visible pinholes in a defined area. This is not a replacement for formal testing, but it can quickly flag a mismatch between your expectation and the delivered lot.
If your operation is sensitive, the best "no lab" test is a small pilot run: slit a short length, laminate or apply adhesive, and check for wrinkling, edge burr, and bond stability after 24 hours. Most costly surprises come from downstream interaction: adhesive wet-out, ink anchorage, or thermal exposure.
| Risk area | What you might see | Quick action |
|---|---|---|
| Poor cleanliness | Fish-eyes in coating, weak lamination bond | Request cleanliness control data, confirm rolling oil management |
| Edge issues | Burr, dust, tape delamination at edges | Confirm slitting knives, edge trim standard, and packaging protection |
| Gauge inconsistency | Wrinkles, tension instability | Tighten thickness tolerance agreement and sampling method |
| Pinhole level too high | Barrier failure complaints | Align on pinhole spec by area and test method before production |